Foods that are not processed have not had the goodness extracted; and are far tastier.
Let's take one simple example. As we all know cornflakes and grits too if it's made from refined maizemeal have little flavour; you have to add a lot of sugar or syrup. Already the manufacturer has added too much salt; 365 mg of sodium in a typical 50 gram helping.
A very generous helping of stone-milled grits, 400 grams of porridge, would cost about 20 South African cents; that a very measly US 1c. Add 1/5 cup milk and a teaspoon of natural honey and you can double that.
Yet a most unsatisfying 50 gram helping of cornflakes from which most of the goodness has been extracted, would cost about 350 cents in South Africa; a massive markup. The box costs the manufacturer more than the food inside, if you can call it that.
Foods that are not processed have not had the fibre, vitamins and minerals extracted; nor the important phytonutrients, fats and protein. This is a true wholegrain. It is very tasty and extremely nutritious.
Food companies will try to deceive us by telling us that they have fortified the meal; having just extracted all the best parts.
However I too do not wish to deceive you; it's hard work initially to get foods that are not processed. You may have to grow them yourself.
Whole grain like that above is certainly not a convenience food; finding the unprocessed cornmeal is likely to be difficult and you may have to buy a mill. You have to cook it the night before, enough for several days and then allow it to retrograde in the fridge; and then reheat it in the morning.
So we cook enough for 4 or 5 days, keeping it refrigerated.
But then your large bowl of grits, including the natural honey and milk will cost only 50 South African cents. Divide by 20 to bring it to dollars; a mere pittance.
There is deep concern in the literature these days about what is being called the “industrialised diet.” Food that has been so processed that it often has little resemblance to the natural product from which it was made; to the extent that the original is now often very difficult to find.
Many examples come to mind; I’ll mention just a few.
There are two extreme views on the subject; and in between one that is largely ignored and sorely neglected.
The first is that we live in an open society where people supposedly have free choice. If they decide to vape themselves to death, snort cocaine and indulge in unprotected sex that is their democratic right. In principle the liberty to enjoy highly-processed food is little different. Government and in fact society as a whole should not interfere in any way.
Those who adhere to this view of freedom of choice would see nothing immoral about growing tobacco, distilling alcoholic beverages and extracting much of the goodness from farm products. The public is eagerly waiting to buy and may grumble but have little concern about the astronomic mark up in price. These companies are simply providing what the people want.
Then there is a second view that such things are unconscionable and it is society’s responsibility to intervene and protect citizens from such exploitation. Prohibition of the sale of spirits, dagga and drugs is the duty of government. At the very least there should be punitive “sin taxes” on the sale of such products; as has just been applied to vaping.
And then lying between these two world views lies a road less travelled; educating the public about the dangers of substance abuse, including all the so-called foods pertaining to the industrialised diet that are freely advertised and promoted.
So that no person can ever say they didn’t know about the dangers of eating stuff, I hesitate to call it food, from which the nourishment has been extracted; and many chemicals, sugar and salt have been added to account for the loss of the natural flavour.
Political correctness lies at the centre of this dilemma. Educating the public means grasping many thorny nettles that society has been very reluctant to do, choosing rather to let people exercise their democratic rights despite the great dangers associated with these “unsafe practices.” The sacredness of the individual far surpasses the common good.
The great exception, one that I would suggest proves the rule, is on the subject of smoking. Fifty years ago nearly half of all adults smoked. As the dangers became more apparent finally government made the very unpopular decision to prohibit smoking indoors and to tax tobacco products heavily. Today less than 20% of adults smoke; tens of millions of lives have been saved.
In sharp contrast, HIV infection has proved far too prickly an issue for society to grasp. Today the prevalence continues to rise with 20% of young and middle-aged adults in South Africa now being infected. So too the obesity pandemic and attendant diabetes; it’s “fat bashing.”
The responsibility, one in which I would suggest society has been gravely amiss, lies equally with the Department of Health, every educator and certainly every doctor; parents and the media too. Just imagine if thirty years ago every teacher, minister of religion and radio announcer started the day with a statement to the effect that every person who sleeps around will become chronically ill, have to take toxic medicine for the rest of their lives and probably die long before their time.
How many of the three million South African victims of HIV who have died would still be alive? If each hour every TV station was to give 30 seconds to a public service slot. The number of child-headed homes is terrifying. If it wasn’t for grannies, society would have collapsed.
The Human Immunodeficiency Virus is just as deadly as the bacteria that cause meningitis, TB and cholera; it just kills more slowly. There is no way around it; if HIV had been treated as a notifiable disease, with the same energy and transparency as Covid, millions of lives in South Africa would have been saved; it’s a deadly infection, not some holy cow.
The irritating philosophical question is who then should be responsible for picking up the tab when those who indulge in unsafe practices begin to succumb. I have the right to smoke but who must cough up when I get cancer, emphysema or have a stroke?
I can indulge in sugary treats but who twenty years later must pay for the insulin? We can allow millers to extract the best part from our grains; but why then are we so surprised when 50% of children in many rural villages are permanently stunted and are unable to read, write and do basic arithmetic?
What has all this to do with Our Green Home, you may be asking? We have unequivocally chosen the road less travelled and we invite you to walk with us; it will make all the difference, perhaps only in ages hence.
Most South Africans have chosen the other road, the one more travelled, with terrible consequences. We find ourselves amongst the ten most unhealthy countries in the world.
That will mean growing as much of your own fruit and veg as you can. And avoiding toxic chemicals in the water we drink, the air we breathe and in the food we eat; sleeping with just one partner.
It may mean pulling the sweet tooth. Or keeping bees, natural unprocessed honey is the only source of sweetening that comes without consequences; and even that should be in limited amounts. Just this week the WHO has come out strongly against artificial sugars which lace so many foods pertaining to the industrial diet.
Your own chickens, rabbits and worm farms may come into the equation for the real nutters as we strive to enjoy long and healthy lives, free from disease and chronic medication.
The industrial diet is killing us; literally. Alas, something will get us all eventually. Now we see through a glass darkly; enough is known to make a start but much remains pure mystery.
Foods that are not processed are much cheaper and more wholesome.
Our newsletter is entitled "create a cyan zone" at your home, preserving both yourself, the family and Mother Earth for future generations. We promise not to spam you with daily emails promoting various products. You may get an occasional nudge to buy one of my books.
Here are the back issues.
Did you find this page interesting? How about forwarding it to a friend, or book and food junkie? Better still, a Facebook or Twitter tick would help.
56 Groenekloof Rd,